FORZE Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

17

6

-2

73

2:3

3

1

5.8

-12%

17

17

5

0

67

1:3

6

0

5.8

-3%

12

19

4

-7

60

5:1

3

0

5.4

-27%

15

18

1

-3

62

2:3

4

0

5.3

-14%

12

21

3

-9

56

2:4

4

0

4.7

-23%

Total

71

92

19

-21

318

12:14

20

1

5.4

-16%

AGO Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

3

+9

102

5:2

5

0

7.4

+22%

21

15

4

+6

75

1:2

6

0

6.3

+8%

16

14

2

+2

69

4:3

3

1

5.9

-9%

15

13

4

+2

68

2:0

4

0

5.9

+3%

14

15

4

-1

63

2:5

3

0

5.4

+1%

Total

92

74

17

+18

376

14:12

21

1

6.2

+5%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of FORZE vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Nuke Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Nuke were rallen, who contributed 26 kills, and F1KU, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9785 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FORZE on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for FORZE, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FORZE on Nuke included FL1T, who contributed 15 kills, and almazer, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8205 total damage, FORZE couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, FORZE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date