FORZE Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

18

3

+2

84

2:1

4

0

6.4

+18%

17

21

3

-4

80

6:2

4

0

6.1

+1%

18

15

1

+3

67

4:3

5

0

6.1

-2%

18

17

4

+1

80

0:5

6

0

5.8

+16%

11

17

3

-6

54

1:1

3

0

4.8

-24%

Total

84

88

14

-4

365

13:12

22

0

5.8

+2%

MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

17

4

+4

92

5:1

5

0

7.3

+24%

22

16

3

+6

84

4:3

7

0

7.1

+15%

19

15

1

+4

83

1:0

5

2

6.9

+15%

14

20

2

-6

69

2:4

4

1

5.6

-6%

12

17

5

-5

56

0:5

2

0

4.9

-20%

Total

88

85

15

+3

384

12:13

23

3

6.4

+6%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of FORZE vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were LUCAS1, who contributed 21 kills, and vsm, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9600 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FORZE on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for FORZE, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FORZE on Nuke included almazer, who contributed 20 kills, and facecrack, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9120 total damage, FORZE couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, FORZE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date