FUSION Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

11

3

+10

76

1:2

4

0

7.0

+28%

16

16

10

0

92

3:3

4

0

6.7

+7%

13

17

9

-4

80

5:3

3

0

6.5

-2%

13

12

3

+1

57

2:1

3

0

5.8

-7%

15

14

5

+1

57

1:1

4

1

5.8

+2%

Total

78

70

30

+8

362

12:10

18

1

6.4

+6%

Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

12

2

+2

67

5:2

3

0

6.4

+1%

16

16

4

0

70

1:3

5

1

6.1

-8%

17

16

2

+1

70

1:1

2

0

5.9

-8%

11

17

6

-6

73

3:4

2

0

5.3

-15%

12

17

5

-5

62

0:2

1

0

5.2

-11%

Total

70

78

19

-8

341

10:12

13

1

5.8

-8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of FUSION vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

FUSION on Inferno Analysis

FUSION demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FUSION on Inferno were christo, who contributed 21 kills, and KUN, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8319 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FUSION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 8 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Gafolo, who contributed 14 kills, and rdnzao, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7839 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent FUSION from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date