G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

18

6

3

+12

102

1:1

7

1

7.7

+50%

15

14

3

+1

95

5:1

4

0

7.0

+4%

18

8

2

+10

79

3:2

6

0

7.0

+36%

13

8

6

+5

79

2:0

4

0

6.7

+7%

15

8

3

+7

83

3:2

3

0

6.7

+32%

Total

79

44

17

+35

438

14:6

24

1

7.0

+26%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

17

3

-5

90

2:3

3

0

6.1

0%

9

16

3

-7

62

0:0

3

0

5.1

-28%

7

16

1

-9

40

2:2

0

0

4.4

-42%

8

17

4

-9

49

0:5

1

0

4.2

-29%

4

17

3

-13

44

2:4

0

0

4.0

-47%

Total

40

83

14

-43

286

6:14

7

0

4.8

-29%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were nexa, who contributed 18 kills, and huNter, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8752 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included k1to, who contributed 12 kills, and XANTARES, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5715 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date