G2 Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

22

7

0

88

3:5

6

0

6.4

-2%

19

18

4

+1

81

3:2

7

1

6.3

-1%

15

18

2

-3

56

2:3

2

1

5.4

-5%

9

18

9

-9

56

1:2

2

0

4.8

-21%

13

23

2

-10

48

2:4

3

0

4.6

-28%

Total

78

99

24

-21

329

11:16

20

2

5.5

-11%

BIG Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

18

8

+8

119

6:3

10

0

7.8

+29%

24

13

7

+11

84

8:2

8

0

7.3

+20%

19

14

1

+5

77

0:4

6

2

6.4

+5%

16

17

4

-1

79

1:2

1

0

5.8

+7%

13

17

3

-4

44

1:0

4

1

5.2

-19%

Total

98

79

23

+19

403

16:11

29

3

6.5

+8%

Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Dust II Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Dust II were tabseN, who contributed 26 kills, and syrsoN, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10878 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 on Dust II included NiKo, who contributed 22 kills, and huNter, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8885 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date