G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

14

7

+10

102

8:2

7

1

8.7

+20%

17

12

3

+5

71

3:0

4

1

6.7

-3%

17

14

4

+3

72

2:2

3

0

6.0

0%

12

13

1

-1

51

1:1

4

1

5.4

-12%

9

17

4

-8

53

3:3

0

0

4.8

-14%

Total

79

70

19

+9

349

17:8

18

3

6.3

-2%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

17

4

+2

84

2:4

5

0

6.4

+3%

16

13

0

+3

69

2:1

4

0

5.9

+2%

11

18

2

-7

61

1:2

1

0

5.0

-21%

13

18

2

-5

73

2:8

3

0

4.8

-6%

10

14

3

-4

46

1:2

1

0

4.7

-24%

Total

69

80

11

-11

332

8:17

14

0

5.4

-9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were NiKo, who contributed 24 kills, and m0NESY, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8720 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included tabseN, who contributed 19 kills, and Krimbo, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8308 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date