G2 Scoreboard Nuke (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

16

2

+16

116

3:3

11

1

8.2

+41%

26

16

3

+10

98

5:0

6

0

7.6

+36%

17

13

5

+4

67

3:1

5

0

6.3

+4%

17

21

3

-4

80

3:4

4

0

5.9

-14%

12

15

2

-3

47

2:3

4

0

4.9

-17%

Total

104

81

15

+23

407

16:11

30

1

6.6

+10%

FURIA Scoreboard Nuke (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

5

+4

80

1:1

6

2

6.6

0%

17

21

6

-4

81

2:2

5

1

6.0

-12%

17

20

2

-3

69

3:5

2

0

5.4

-16%

15

23

2

-8

59

5:4

2

0

5.2

-20%

8

22

5

-14

47

0:4

3

1

4.2

-38%

Total

80

105

20

-25

336

11:16

18

4

5.5

-17%

Teams advantage Nuke (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs FURIA by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Nuke Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Nuke were huNter, who contributed 32 kills, and AMANEK, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10983 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FURIA on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for FURIA, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FURIA on Nuke included HEN1, who contributed 23 kills, and KSCERATO, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9076 total damage, FURIA couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, FURIA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date