G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

25

11

5

+14

108

7:2

7

1

8.7

+33%

18

9

6

+9

84

2:0

7

1

7.1

+32%

19

10

4

+9

80

2:2

3

1

7.0

+29%

12

13

4

-1

68

1:0

4

0

5.7

-10%

8

14

4

-6

47

1:6

0

0

4.5

-18%

Total

82

57

23

+25

387

13:10

21

3

6.6

+13%

MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

16

2

+1

83

3:0

3

0

6.7

+11%

11

15

7

-4

76

1:0

2

1

5.9

-3%

9

16

2

-7

40

2:1

1

1

4.8

-29%

11

18

4

-7

59

2:8

3

0

4.5

-4%

7

19

1

-12

37

2:4

1

0

3.8

-20%

Total

55

84

16

-29

295

10:13

10

2

5.2

-9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were NiKo, who contributed 25 kills, and nexa, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8904 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno included shz, who contributed 17 kills, and yeL, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6791 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date