G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

14

8

+8

109

8:1

4

1

8.6

+20%

18

14

2

+4

67

4:0

4

0

6.6

+22%

18

15

2

+3

81

3:1

4

1

6.4

+3%

17

16

2

+1

61

2:2

3

0

5.9

-14%

16

18

6

-2

65

0:4

3

0

5.5

-15%

Total

91

77

20

+14

382

17:8

18

2

6.6

+3%

OG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

18

3

+2

65

3:2

6

1

6.2

-10%

16

18

3

-2

70

3:4

3

0

5.9

-8%

15

18

3

-3

68

1:5

3

0

5.4

-5%

13

21

4

-8

68

1:4

3

0

5.2

-15%

12

17

6

-5

56

0:2

4

0

5.0

-14%

Total

76

92

19

-16

328

8:17

19

1

5.5

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were NiKo, who contributed 22 kills, and HooXi, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9553 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Inferno included regali, who contributed 20 kills, and flameZ, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8194 total damage, OG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date