Galorys Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

9

1

+5

60

3:1

4

1

6.5

+7%

15

17

0

-2

67

4:2

4

0

6.0

-9%

9

14

4

-5

54

2:1

1

0

5.3

-18%

8

10

4

-2

58

1:1

2

0

5.2

-18%

8

17

9

-9

65

1:4

2

0

4.8

-20%

Total

54

67

18

-13

303

11:9

13

1

5.6

-12%

MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

12

4

+7

93

3:2

2

1

7.3

+25%

13

10

4

+3

68

1:3

3

1

5.9

-1%

14

10

2

+4

59

2:2

4

0

5.9

+1%

11

13

6

-2

71

2:3

3

1

5.9

-5%

10

10

3

0

58

1:1

2

0

5.6

-3%

Total

67

55

19

+12

349

9:11

14

3

6.1

+3%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Galorys vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were brnz4n, who contributed 19 kills, and insani, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 6977 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Galorys on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Galorys, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Galorys on Nuke included detr0ittJ, who contributed 14 kills, and hoax, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6064 total damage, Galorys couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date