Gambit Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

31

10

2

+21

109

5:0

9

0

9.0

+41%

20

12

3

+8

96

3:2

5

0

7.1

+18%

17

13

8

+4

79

4:3

4

1

6.5

+4%

16

14

4

+2

68

3:2

2

0

6.0

+2%

11

12

6

-1

60

1:1

4

0

5.4

-2%

Total

95

61

23

+34

412

16:8

24

1

6.8

+13%

Complexity Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

17

2

+4

91

3:5

6

0

6.8

+4%

16

21

4

-5

77

2:1

5

0

5.8

-4%

16

19

2

-3

59

1:1

4

1

5.7

-27%

5

19

2

-14

35

2:3

1

0

4.0

-50%

3

19

1

-16

25

0:6

1

0

2.8

-56%

Total

61

95

11

-34

287

8:16

17

1

5.0

-27%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Gambit vs Complexity by the Bo3.gg Team

Gambit on Dust II Analysis

Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Gambit on Dust II were sh1ro, who contributed 31 kills, and Ax1Le, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9885 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Complexity on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Complexity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Complexity on Dust II included floppy, who contributed 21 kills, and Grim, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6891 total damage, Complexity couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, Complexity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date