Gambit Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

14

5

+7

101

4:2

6

1

7.7

+14%

21

11

3

+10

83

3:2

6

0

7.4

+10%

18

10

4

+8

88

2:1

5

0

6.9

+35%

18

14

5

+4

88

2:1

5

0

6.8

+14%

12

15

5

-3

64

3:1

3

0

5.5

-20%

Total

90

64

22

+26

425

14:7

25

1

6.8

+10%

G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

17

5

-2

75

1:3

4

0

5.9

-11%

13

17

4

-4

66

0:0

2

0

5.8

-8%

13

19

3

-6

66

0:3

3

0

5.3

-20%

13

20

3

-7

63

3:5

3

0

5.0

-10%

9

18

4

-9

49

2:2

2

0

4.7

-25%

Total

63

91

19

-28

318

6:13

14

0

5.3

-15%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Gambit vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

Gambit on Inferno Analysis

Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Gambit on Inferno were Hobbit, who contributed 21 kills, and sh1ro, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9341 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno included NiKo, who contributed 15 kills, and nexa, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7002 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date