Gambit Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

16

2

+10

103

6:4

6

0

7.8

+19%

19

10

2

+9

69

0:0

5

2

7.0

+3%

15

13

2

+2

80

2:2

5

0

6.1

+14%

13

19

10

-6

76

5:1

2

1

6.1

-12%

14

15

3

-1

81

2:2

3

0

6.1

-9%

Total

87

73

19

+14

410

15:9

21

3

6.6

+3%

G2 Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

17

4

0

84

1:2

6

0

6.1

0%

17

16

4

+1

61

3:1

2

0

5.9

-10%

14

17

3

-3

60

1:3

3

0

5.1

-6%

15

17

2

-2

57

0:3

3

0

5.1

-7%

10

20

5

-10

60

4:6

2

1

4.8

-16%

Total

73

87

18

-14

322

9:15

16

1

5.4

-8%

Teams advantage Mirage (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Gambit vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

Gambit on Mirage Analysis

Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Gambit on Mirage were Ax1Le, who contributed 26 kills, and sh1ro, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 9842 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 on Mirage included huNter, who contributed 17 kills, and NiKo, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7722 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date