Gambit Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

12

4

+11

78

6:0

6

0

7.6

+10%

16

19

9

-3

79

3:3

3

0

6.0

-4%

18

17

5

+1

81

1:3

5

0

6.0

-4%

15

17

4

-2

72

4:4

4

0

5.9

-14%

15

12

3

+3

58

1:1

5

0

5.6

+7%

Total

87

77

25

+10

367

15:11

23

0

6.2

-1%

HAVU Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

15

6

+5

86

4:0

4

1

7.2

+17%

21

20

2

+1

93

4:6

4

0

6.4

+4%

14

15

6

-1

64

1:4

3

0

5.5

-9%

14

20

2

-6

59

2:4

4

0

5.0

-17%

8

18

2

-10

39

0:1

1

0

4.1

-30%

Total

77

88

18

-11

341

11:15

16

1

5.6

-7%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Gambit vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

Gambit on Dust II Analysis

Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Gambit on Dust II were sh1ro, who contributed 23 kills, and nafany, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9532 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Dust II included ZOREE, who contributed 20 kills, and xseveN, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8862 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date