Gambit Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

9

2

+16

101

4:0

9

1

8.6

+62%

14

4

7

+10

79

2:1

3

1

6.8

+17%

15

15

4

0

83

4:3

4

0

6.3

-5%

16

13

2

+3

62

3:2

5

0

5.8

+3%

8

10

7

-2

57

0:2

2

0

5.0

-19%

Total

78

51

22

+27

382

13:8

23

2

6.5

+12%

Virtus.pro Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

14

1

0

68

2:0

3

0

6.2

+2%

12

17

4

-5

76

5:7

2

0

5.6

-16%

13

15

2

-2

51

1:0

3

0

5.5

-26%

7

15

2

-8

43

0:1

2

0

4.5

-34%

5

17

2

-12

37

0:5

2

0

3.4

-45%

Total

51

78

11

-27

276

8:13

12

0

5.0

-24%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Gambit vs Virtus.pro by the Bo3.gg Team

Gambit on Dust II Analysis

Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Gambit on Dust II were interz, who contributed 25 kills, and sh1ro, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8403 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Virtus.pro on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Virtus.pro, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Dust II included Sanji, who contributed 14 kills, and YEKINDAR, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6080 total damage, Virtus.pro couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, Virtus.pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date