GODSENT Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

10

2

+14

111

7:3

6

0

8.6

+31%

20

11

8

+9

113

3:1

5

0

7.9

+30%

21

12

3

+9

86

1:3

4

0

6.8

+32%

8

8

3

0

43

1:0

2

1

5.4

-20%

9

13

5

-4

54

1:1

2

0

5.1

-27%

Total

82

54

21

+28

407

13:8

19

1

6.8

+9%

O PLANO Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

16

2

-3

70

3:2

3

0

5.9

-4%

10

18

4

-8

69

4:3

2

0

5.2

-26%

12

16

7

-4

63

0:2

5

0

5.2

+3%

12

15

2

-3

56

0:6

3

0

4.7

-14%

5

17

2

-12

48

1:0

0

0

4.2

-45%

Total

52

82

17

-30

306

8:13

13

0

5.0

-17%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of GODSENT vs O PLANO by the Bo3.gg Team

GODSENT on Vertigo Analysis

GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GODSENT on Vertigo were felps, who contributed 24 kills, and b4rtiN, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8550 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


O PLANO on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for O PLANO, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for O PLANO on Vertigo included LUCAS1, who contributed 13 kills, and vsm, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6428 total damage, O PLANO couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, O PLANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date