GODSENT Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

11

4

+14

116

2:2

7

0

8.3

+32%

21

13

6

+8

98

2:4

8

0

7.0

+18%

12

14

5

-2

73

5:2

2

0

6.4

-9%

16

10

1

+6

61

2:1

5

0

6.2

+3%

11

7

4

+4

47

2:1

1

0

5.7

+2%

Total

85

55

20

+30

395

13:10

23

0

6.7

+9%

paiN Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

14

1

+1

70

2:0

2

2

6.4

-12%

12

19

3

-7

73

3:1

2

0

5.6

-20%

14

17

4

-3

69

3:3

5

0

5.6

-15%

8

17

4

-9

47

1:2

3

0

4.4

-35%

5

18

2

-13

33

1:7

0

0

3.4

-45%

Total

54

85

14

-31

292

10:13

12

2

5.1

-25%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of GODSENT vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team

GODSENT on Inferno Analysis

GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno were felps, who contributed 25 kills, and dumau, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9085 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


paiN on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for paiN on Inferno included saffee, who contributed 15 kills, and NEKIZ, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6718 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date