HAVU Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

17

2

-4

81

2:2

3

0

5.8

+4%

13

14

2

-1

62

2:4

3

1

5.6

-6%

12

15

2

-3

61

1:2

3

0

5.3

-9%

8

17

3

-9

56

1:1

1

0

4.6

-8%

6

18

1

-12

45

1:4

1

0

3.8

-41%

Total

52

81

10

-29

305

7:13

11

1

5.0

-12%

Aurora Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

13

5

+9

116

8:2

7

0

8.2

+30%

22

11

7

+11

120

2:2

5

0

8.1

+48%

14

10

4

+4

72

2:2

3

0

5.8

-1%

13

10

2

+3

58

1:0

5

0

5.7

-2%

10

8

4

+2

52

0:1

1

0

5.3

-6%

Total

81

52

22

+29

418

13:7

21

0

6.6

+14%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of HAVU vs Aurora by the Bo3.gg Team

Aurora on Nuke Analysis

Aurora demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Aurora on Nuke were KENSI, who contributed 22 kills, and Lack1, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8358 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Aurora held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Nuke included Airax, who contributed 13 kills, and Banjo, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6092 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Aurora from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date