HAVU Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

15

1

+3

89

5:1

4

0

6.7

+15%

12

12

2

0

62

0:1

3

2

5.8

+3%

12

12

2

0

53

2:0

2

0

5.5

-2%

13

19

6

-6

75

1:5

5

0

5.1

-1%

7

18

2

-11

29

4:4

0

0

4.1

-28%

Total

62

76

13

-14

309

12:11

14

2

5.4

-3%

BLEED Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

15

6

+4

100

7:4

4

1

7.6

+18%

19

16

8

+3

99

2:4

5

0

6.6

+11%

18

9

3

+9

61

1:0

6

0

6.5

+11%

12

10

7

+2

68

0:0

4

0

5.9

+1%

8

12

1

-4

36

1:4

1

1

4.7

-27%

Total

76

62

25

+14

364

11:12

20

2

6.3

+3%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of HAVU vs BLEED by the Bo3.gg Team

BLEED on Anubis Analysis

BLEED demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BLEED on Anubis were CYPHER, who contributed 19 kills, and hampus, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8363 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, BLEED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Anubis included uli, who contributed 18 kills, and Jelo, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7106 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent BLEED from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date