0 Comments
72
83
22
-11
342
13:11
16
1
-12%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Vertigo
54%
Inferno
41%
Mirage
27%
Anubis
20%
Ancient
17%
Overpass
9%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
80%
10
0
Anubis
38%
8
0
Ancient
38%
13
0
Overpass
38%
8
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
36
Vertigo
54%
28
3
Inferno
41%
17
11
Mirage
53%
32
8
Anubis
58%
33
6
Ancient
55%
49
0
Overpass
47%
15
16
Last results
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wlwww
Info
Map Analysis of HOTU vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Ancient Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Ancient were ZeRRoFIX, who contributed 20 kills, and jackasmo, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9067 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HOTU on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for HOTU, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HOTU on Ancient included anttz, who contributed 22 kills, and fineshine52, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8204 total damage, HOTU couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments