IKLA Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

15

8

+5

100

3:0

4

1

8.0

+32%

17

17

3

0

90

2:5

5

0

6.1

+5%

12

14

0

-2

48

2:3

2

1

5.5

-17%

12

16

2

-4

59

2:2

3

0

5.1

-23%

9

20

4

-11

51

0:3

1

0

4.2

-35%

Total

70

82

17

-12

348

9:13

15

2

5.8

-8%

Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

15

7

+5

97

4:0

4

1

7.5

+26%

20

11

4

+9

84

3:1

5

1

7.3

+31%

19

15

6

+4

86

3:1

4

0

7.0

+24%

14

14

4

0

76

3:1

3

0

6.5

-5%

9

15

6

-6

54

0:6

2

0

4.3

-24%

Total

82

70

27

+12

397

13:9

18

2

6.5

+10%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of IKLA vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were sausol, who contributed 20 kills, and LNZ, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8730 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


IKLA on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for IKLA, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for IKLA on Anubis included Topa, who contributed 20 kills, and MICHU, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7648 total damage, IKLA couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, IKLA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date