IN.GAME Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

18

3

+8

85

2:2

8

1

7.0

+13%

18

17

9

+1

70

1:0

7

0

6.1

-5%

18

16

5

+2

61

8:5

5

0

6.0

-3%

18

23

4

-5

83

2:5

4

1

5.8

-9%

15

18

4

-3

62

1:3

5

0

5.4

-5%

Total

95

92

25

+3

361

14:15

29

2

6.1

-2%

EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

1

+9

84

5:1

8

0

7.1

+18%

23

18

4

+5

94

2:2

5

0

6.7

+14%

15

23

2

-8

61

6:2

6

0

5.6

-6%

14

18

3

-4

53

1:4

4

0

5.0

-8%

12

20

5

-8

55

1:5

2

0

4.6

-16%

Total

90

96

15

-6

347

15:14

25

0

5.8

0%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of IN.GAME vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team

IN.GAME on Inferno Analysis

IN.GAME demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for IN.GAME on Inferno were L4F, who contributed 26 kills, and fabi, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10473 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, IN.GAME held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included s4ltovsk1yy, who contributed 26 kills, and byr9, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10050 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent IN.GAME from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date