Isurus Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

17

4

+5

76

3:2

7

0

6.7

+6%

16

18

4

-2

83

2:5

3

0

5.8

+3%

14

19

2

-5

63

3:1

2

0

5.7

-15%

15

17

8

-2

61

2:3

4

0

5.6

-6%

16

17

3

-1

61

0:6

5

0

5.2

-9%

Total

83

88

21

-5

344

10:17

21

0

5.8

-4%

Leviatan Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

21

18

3

+3

102

7:2

4

0

7.4

+11%

20

11

2

+9

76

1:1

4

1

6.8

+18%

19

18

5

+1

79

5:3

8

1

6.8

+8%

17

18

1

-1

56

3:1

4

0

5.6

-11%

11

18

3

-7

49

1:3

2

0

4.8

-27%

Total

88

83

14

+5

363

17:10

22

2

6.3

0%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Isurus vs Leviatan by the Bo3.gg Team

Leviatan on Inferno Analysis

Leviatan demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Leviatan on Inferno were 1962, who contributed 21 kills, and Yokowow, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9794 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Leviatan held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Isurus on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Isurus, as they managed to secure 12 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Isurus on Inferno included fakzwall, who contributed 22 kills, and Noktse, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9293 total damage, Isurus couldn't prevent Leviatan from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Isurus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date