Leviatan Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

22

2

-2

82

3:4

5

1

6.3

+1%

13

20

4

-7

58

5:4

2

0

5.5

-22%

14

18

2

-4

62

1:2

3

0

5.4

-13%

13

17

5

-4

55

0:3

2

0

5.1

-21%

12

22

3

-10

56

1:3

3

0

4.8

-30%

Total

72

99

16

-27

314

10:16

15

1

5.4

-17%

Isurus Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

14

11

+11

94

6:2

8

0

7.8

+32%

19

14

6

+5

92

4:1

6

0

7.0

+16%

21

11

4

+10

73

2:1

5

0

6.7

+12%

19

15

5

+4

79

3:4

4

1

6.3

+5%

15

18

7

-3

70

1:2

3

0

5.7

-10%

Total

99

72

33

+27

407

16:10

26

1

6.7

+11%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Leviatan vs Isurus by the Bo3.gg Team

Isurus on Inferno Analysis

Isurus demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Isurus on Inferno were Noktse, who contributed 25 kills, and deco, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10588 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Leviatan on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Leviatan, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Leviatan on Inferno included reversive, who contributed 20 kills, and 1962, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8162 total damage, Leviatan couldn't prevent Isurus from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Leviatan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date