G2 Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

7

5

+16

106

2:1

6

1

8.6

+32%

18

11

7

+7

79

1:0

3

0

6.8

+23%

16

15

7

+1

90

2:2

2

0

6.7

+5%

12

13

2

-1

58

4:4

3

0

5.7

+3%

7

14

7

-7

49

2:3

3

0

4.4

-24%

Total

76

60

28

+16

382

11:10

17

1

6.4

+8%

Liquid Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

12

7

+3

80

0:0

3

1

6.6

+2%

16

16

4

0

74

1:1

3

0

6.1

-12%

11

17

6

-6

83

5:5

2

0

5.6

-10%

10

15

2

-5

50

4:2

1

0

5.3

-22%

8

16

4

-8

53

0:3

2

0

4.3

-29%

Total

60

76

23

-16

340

10:11

11

1

5.6

-14%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Anubis Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Anubis were m0NESY, who contributed 23 kills, and nexa, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8027 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Liquid on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Liquid, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Liquid on Anubis included Twistzz, who contributed 15 kills, and NAF, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7142 total damage, Liquid couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Liquid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date