Liquid Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

12

3

+11

97

2:2

5

0

7.4

+30%

18

13

7

+5

85

2:4

4

0

6.5

+5%

11

16

5

-5

61

1:4

2

0

5.0

-22%

7

17

8

-10

46

2:2

1

0

4.2

-34%

9

15

4

-6

37

1:3

1

0

4.2

-30%

Total

68

73

27

-5

326

8:15

13

0

5.5

-10%

SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

13

9

+3

81

5:3

4

0

6.6

+9%

15

15

4

0

77

3:0

3

0

6.2

+8%

16

14

2

+2

63

2:0

4

0

6.1

-2%

12

13

4

-1

52

3:2

2

0

5.6

-17%

13

15

3

-2

63

2:3

3

0

5.3

-12%

Total

72

70

22

+2

337

15:8

16

0

6.0

-3%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Liquid vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Nuke Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke were MUTiRiS, who contributed 16 kills, and rmn, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7748 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Liquid on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Liquid, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Liquid on Nuke included skullz, who contributed 23 kills, and NAF, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7492 total damage, Liquid couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Liquid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date