Lyngby Vikings Scoreboard Nuke (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

5

3

+23

136

3:0

9

0

9.5

+95%

14

9

2

+5

73

6:0

3

0

7.1

+11%

16

7

2

+9

89

5:3

2

0

7.1

+29%

15

9

2

+6

89

2:0

4

0

6.7

+21%

12

6

1

+6

64

1:0

2

0

5.9

+8%

Total

85

36

10

+49

450

17:3

20

0

7.3

+33%

Fiend Scoreboard Nuke (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

8

18

0

-10

47

2:2

2

0

4.6

-42%

8

17

1

-9

50

0:3

2

1

4.6

-41%

7

17

3

-10

65

0:4

0

0

4.6

-27%

6

17

2

-11

63

0:5

2

1

4.3

-29%

7

16

0

-9

39

1:3

1

0

4.3

-46%

Total

36

85

6

-49

265

3:17

7

2

4.5

-37%

Teams advantage Nuke (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs Fiend by the Bo3.gg Team

Lyngby Vikings on Nuke Analysis

Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Nuke were birdfromsky, who contributed 28 kills, and FASHR, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9007 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Fiend on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Fiend, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Fiend on Nuke included REDSTAR, who contributed 8 kills, and dream3r, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5293 total damage, Fiend couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Fiend struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date