Lyngby Vikings Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

4

+7

100

2:0

7

1

7.5

+20%

19

16

1

+3

78

1:5

5

1

5.9

+14%

12

17

5

-5

62

2:3

2

0

5.1

-15%

12

18

4

-6

46

1:4

3

0

4.6

-19%

8

17

7

-9

44

2:5

2

0

4.1

-32%

Total

75

85

21

-10

330

8:17

19

2

5.5

-6%

MASONIC Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

23

14

6

+9

104

5:0

8

0

8.1

+49%

21

13

3

+8

75

2:2

5

0

6.9

+15%

16

17

4

-1

73

4:1

5

0

6.4

-4%

15

14

5

+1

64

2:1

2

1

6.3

-4%

10

17

5

-7

48

4:4

2

1

5.2

-19%

Total

85

75

23

+10

365

17:8

22

2

6.6

+7%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team

MASONIC on Nuke Analysis

MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MASONIC on Nuke were blaq, who contributed 23 kills, and Queenix, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9124 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Lyngby Vikings on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Lyngby Vikings, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Nuke included Daffu, who contributed 24 kills, and FASHR, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8257 total damage, Lyngby Vikings couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Lyngby Vikings struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date