M1 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

5

+2

85

3:1

3

0

6.4

+7%

16

16

2

0

70

4:2

3

0

5.9

-3%

17

19

6

-2

66

2:4

5

0

5.7

+6%

9

13

2

-4

37

1:1

1

0

4.6

-12%

11

22

2

-11

61

1:6

2

0

4.2

-9%

Total

71

86

17

-15

320

11:14

14

0

5.4

-2%

Izako Boars Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

17

3

+3

98

6:3

6

0

7.1

+12%

21

14

3

+7

86

2:2

6

0

6.6

+21%

14

13

3

+1

68

2:0

5

0

6.0

+5%

17

16

3

+1

72

4:4

5

0

5.9

+2%

14

11

3

+3

54

0:2

3

0

5.5

+4%

Total

86

71

15

+15

378

14:11

25

0

6.2

+9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of M1 vs Izako Boars by the Bo3.gg Team

Izako Boars on Inferno Analysis

Izako Boars demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Izako Boars on Inferno were Szejn, who contributed 20 kills, and STOMP, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9441 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Izako Boars held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


M1 on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for M1, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for M1 on Inferno included SAYN, who contributed 18 kills, and Czapel, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7996 total damage, M1 couldn't prevent Izako Boars from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, M1 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date