MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

21

3

+7

100

3:5

10

0

7.0

+16%

21

17

8

+4

95

3:3

3

0

6.7

+14%

22

13

3

+9

70

1:0

6

0

6.6

+8%

20

16

6

+4

80

5:5

5

0

6.5

+1%

16

12

7

+4

62

2:0

5

0

6.1

-8%

Total

107

79

27

+28

407

14:13

29

0

6.5

+6%

9z Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

20

2

+3

76

1:2

6

1

6.4

+24%

18

20

2

-2

72

2:3

4

1

5.7

-11%

15

20

2

-5

64

5:5

2

0

5.3

-12%

14

23

4

-9

62

1:2

3

1

5.3

-29%

8

24

3

-16

44

4:2

0

0

4.3

-42%

Total

78

107

13

-29

319

13:14

15

3

5.4

-14%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Anubis Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis were brnz4n, who contributed 28 kills, and Tuurtle, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11384 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


9z on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for 9z, as they managed to secure 11 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 9z on Anubis included Buda, who contributed 23 kills, and try, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8920 total damage, 9z couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date