MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

15

3

-1

79

1:2

4

0

5.8

-8%

13

15

2

-2

73

0:3

3

1

5.6

-8%

14

19

4

-5

80

3:6

4

1

5.5

-13%

10

17

3

-7

65

2:2

3

0

5.2

-16%

10

18

2

-8

62

2:1

2

0

5.0

-25%

Total

61

84

14

-23

359

8:14

16

2

5.4

-14%

G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

10

2

+9

73

2:1

5

2

7.6

+3%

18

13

5

+5

91

4:0

5

0

7.5

+32%

16

14

7

+2

97

4:3

4

0

7.2

-3%

18

12

1

+6

77

2:1

4

1

6.9

+10%

13

13

6

0

68

2:3

2

0

6.0

+1%

Total

84

62

21

+22

406

14:8

20

3

7.0

+9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were m0NESY, who contributed 19 kills, and JACKZ, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8936 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno included JOTA, who contributed 14 kills, and exit, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7903 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date