MIBR Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

16

4

-7

83

4:5

1

0

5.4

-16%

8

14

2

-6

60

3:0

1

0

5.3

-25%

11

15

2

-4

68

1:2

4

0

5.2

-15%

8

15

1

-7

57

0:2

2

0

4.6

-20%

4

16

3

-12

33

0:1

0

0

3.4

-48%

Total

40

76

12

-36

302

8:10

8

0

4.8

-25%

G2 Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

8

2

+14

115

3:0

7

0

8.8

+51%

15

10

2

+5

80

2:2

5

0

6.9

+15%

15

10

1

+5

72

2:3

6

1

6.6

+6%

12

7

4

+5

68

2:1

4

0

6.4

+7%

9

8

5

+1

79

1:2

2

0

5.9

+17%

Total

73

43

14

+30

415

10:8

24

1

6.9

+19%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Vertigo Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Vertigo were nexa, who contributed 22 kills, and JACKZ, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7466 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Vertigo included FalleN, who contributed 9 kills, and fer, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5427 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date