MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

19

2

+9

91

4:1

7

0

7.2

+18%

17

14

9

+3

71

4:1

3

1

6.3

-4%

22

17

2

+5

85

2:4

7

0

6.2

+6%

13

15

4

-2

50

3:2

2

0

5.3

-17%

13

18

6

-5

52

2:7

2

0

4.7

-16%

Total

93

83

23

+10

349

15:15

21

1

5.9

-3%

Isurus Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

18

4

+6

82

8:1

6

0

7.2

+14%

13

17

8

-4

67

1:1

2

0

5.4

-11%

18

22

2

-4

67

4:6

4

0

5.4

-10%

14

19

1

-5

52

2:2

2

1

5.3

-20%

14

17

3

-3

50

0:5

4

1

5.1

-9%

Total

83

93

18

-10

318

15:15

18

2

5.7

-7%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Isurus by the Bo3.gg Team

Isurus on Nuke Analysis

Isurus demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Isurus on Nuke were deco, who contributed 24 kills, and Noktse, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9555 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke included brnz4n, who contributed 28 kills, and HEN1, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10455 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent Isurus from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date