MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

16

2

-2

98

1:2

4

0

6.2

+4%

7

12

1

-5

65

1:1

1

0

5.3

-13%

10

11

1

-1

48

1:1

2

0

5.2

-16%

9

12

2

-3

58

1:2

1

0

5.0

-18%

8

15

4

-7

66

3:4

4

0

4.9

-28%

Total

48

66

10

-18

335

7:10

12

0

5.3

-14%

ODDIK Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

11

5

+3

79

4:1

3

1

7.2

+10%

16

11

2

+5

81

4:2

6

0

7.1

+18%

14

8

9

+6

87

0:1

2

1

7.1

+24%

11

9

4

+2

70

2:3

3

1

6.4

+3%

10

12

2

-2

59

0:0

3

0

5.6

-8%

Total

65

51

22

+14

376

10:7

17

3

6.7

+9%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs ODDIK by the Bo3.gg Team

ODDIK on Nuke Analysis

ODDIK demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ODDIK on Nuke were naitte, who contributed 14 kills, and ponter, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 6775 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke included saffee, who contributed 14 kills, and drop, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6030 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent ODDIK from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date