OG Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

16

3

+4

83

3:2

5

1

6.8

+19%

15

11

5

+4

61

3:1

3

0

6.3

0%

16

12

7

+4

62

3:2

4

0

6.3

-3%

14

19

7

-5

80

3:4

3

0

5.8

+5%

14

18

6

-4

73

1:1

3

0

5.5

-5%

Total

79

76

28

+3

359

13:10

18

1

6.1

+3%

MIBR Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

13

5

+14

123

4:1

8

2

8.9

+40%

16

12

4

+4

72

1:0

3

1

6.5

+5%

14

19

4

-5

66

2:3

3

0

5.6

-16%

12

17

1

-5

51

2:6

3

0

4.9

-20%

6

18

10

-12

32

1:3

0

0

3.9

-49%

Total

75

79

24

-4

344

10:13

17

3

6.0

-8%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Vertigo Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Vertigo were Nexius, who contributed 20 kills, and MoDo, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8253 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Vertigo included insani, who contributed 27 kills, and exit, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7919 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date