MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

18

8

9

+10

116

2:1

6

1

8.3

+61%

17

8

5

+9

101

4:0

4

0

7.8

+40%

16

7

5

+9

111

1:2

5

0

7.5

+36%

10

7

3

+3

62

2:0

2

0

5.8

+2%

9

8

3

+1

37

2:3

2

0

5.1

-12%

Total

70

38

25

+32

428

11:6

19

1

6.9

+25%

Sharks Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

16

1

-5

75

3:1

3

0

6.0

-3%

8

12

2

-4

54

0:2

1

0

5.0

-23%

7

14

3

-7

56

1:3

2

0

4.7

-28%

6

14

0

-8

40

2:2

1

0

4.4

-43%

1

14

1

-13

24

0:3

0

0

2.9

-63%

Total

33

70

7

-37

249

6:11

7

0

4.6

-32%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were drop, who contributed 18 kills, and exit, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7270 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Nuke included drg, who contributed 11 kills, and Gafolo, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4233 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date