MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

4

+9

77

4:5

8

1

6.7

+3%

19

20

7

-1

80

2:1

2

0

6.4

-8%

20

20

6

0

71

1:2

7

0

6.1

-5%

14

18

9

-4

61

3:3

3

0

5.5

-19%

14

23

6

-9

64

5:4

3

0

5.2

-24%

Total

93

98

32

-5

353

15:15

23

1

6.0

-11%

Snakes Den Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

20

3

+6

86

1:0

7

0

6.9

+3%

22

24

4

-2

81

7:5

4

0

6.6

-8%

18

17

10

+1

63

4:1

5

0

6.0

-1%

15

15

7

0

57

1:5

4

2

5.4

-4%

16

19

6

-3

60

2:4

2

0

5.3

+1%

Total

97

95

30

+2

348

15:15

22

2

6.0

-2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Snakes Den by the Bo3.gg Team

Snakes Den on Inferno Analysis

Snakes Den demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Snakes Den on Inferno were Wolffe, who contributed 26 kills, and lake, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10431 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Snakes Den held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno included HEN1, who contributed 26 kills, and exit, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10594 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent Snakes Den from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date