Mindfreak Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

14

6

+12

100

4:1

8

0

8.3

+47%

19

15

7

+4

95

0:1

4

0

6.8

+14%

10

11

2

-1

38

0:1

2

1

5.2

-19%

9

15

6

-6

63

1:6

1

0

4.7

-19%

6

20

5

-14

44

3:5

2

0

4.1

-46%

Total

70

75

26

-5

340

8:14

17

1

5.8

-5%

Rooster Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

16

4

+3

92

4:3

5

0

7.0

+19%

16

11

4

+5

74

2:1

3

1

6.9

-4%

16

14

0

+2

68

4:3

4

1

6.5

+3%

14

16

11

-2

90

3:1

4

0

6.3

-3%

10

13

4

-3

45

1:0

3

0

5.4

-16%

Total

75

70

23

+5

369

14:8

19

2

6.4

0%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Mindfreak vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team

Rooster on Anubis Analysis

Rooster demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 12 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Rooster on Anubis were TjP, who contributed 19 kills, and nettik, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8125 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Mindfreak on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Mindfreak, as they managed to secure 10 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Mindfreak on Anubis included supar, who contributed 26 kills, and dangeR, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7486 total damage, Mindfreak couldn't prevent Rooster from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Mindfreak struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date