MOUZ Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

14

4

+4

80

1:0

6

0

6.4

+8%

14

16

7

-2

73

5:1

2

0

6.1

0%

17

13

2

+4

63

2:4

5

0

5.6

+11%

16

18

2

-2

65

4:4

3

0

5.6

-10%

12

13

6

-1

68

2:1

3

0

5.5

-11%

Total

77

74

21

+3

348

14:10

19

0

5.8

0%

G2 Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

13

2

+9

84

2:1

6

1

7.1

+14%

16

14

5

+2

86

1:1

5

1

6.4

+16%

13

16

7

-3

66

2:5

3

0

5.4

+5%

10

18

8

-8

63

3:3

1

0

4.9

-29%

13

17

4

-4

44

2:4

4

0

4.8

-24%

Total

74

78

26

-4

343

10:14

19

2

5.7

-4%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of MOUZ vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Vertigo Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Vertigo were m0NESY, who contributed 22 kills, and nexa, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8226 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MOUZ on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for MOUZ, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MOUZ on Vertigo included Jimpphat, who contributed 18 kills, and Brollan, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8360 total damage, MOUZ couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, MOUZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date