CENSRD Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

20

7

-5

85

1:3

5

1

5.9

+3%

17

19

3

-2

77

3:5

3

0

5.8

+11%

14

21

1

-7

58

1:1

3

0

5.2

-12%

11

20

5

-9

58

2:2

2

0

4.9

-26%

11

22

6

-11

69

2:5

4

0

4.9

-22%

Total

68

102

22

-34

348

9:16

17

1

5.3

-9%

Villainous Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

12

4

+20

130

3:2

8

0

9.2

+23%

20

13

5

+7

72

3:-1

4

0

7.0

0%

19

14

4

+5

88

3:2

6

0

6.9

-3%

13

18

9

-5

79

5:3

3

0

6.0

-12%

14

13

2

+1

59

1:2

2

0

5.6

+4%

Total

98

70

24

+28

428

15:8

23

0

6.9

+2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of CENSRD vs Villainous by the Bo3.gg Team

Villainous on Inferno Analysis

Villainous demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Villainous on Inferno were Cryptic, who contributed 32 kills, and jason, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10700 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Villainous held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CENSRD on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CENSRD, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CENSRD on Inferno included kber, who contributed 15 kills, and Delta9, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8689 total damage, CENSRD couldn't prevent Villainous from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, CENSRD struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date