Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

14

2

+4

67

3:1

4

2

7.3

0%

17

18

3

-1

86

3:1

3

0

6.4

0%

13

16

4

-3

59

2:1

2

0

5.6

-15%

13

18

6

-5

65

1:3

4

0

5.5

-16%

12

19

3

-7

67

3:5

4

0

5.0

-18%

Total

73

85

18

-12

344

12:11

17

2

6.0

-10%

RUBIK Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

14

2

+9

85

4:2

7

0

7.4

+13%

17

17

8

0

108

3:5

4

0

6.4

+7%

20

18

7

+2

83

2:3

5

0

6.3

0%

15

15

7

0

72

1:1

4

1

6.2

+4%

10

11

5

-1

46

1:1

1

3

5.8

-6%

Total

85

75

29

+10

393

11:12

21

4

6.4

+4%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs RUBIK by the Bo3.gg Team

RUBIK on Inferno Analysis

RUBIK demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for RUBIK on Inferno were fleav, who contributed 23 kills, and Aaron, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9040 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, RUBIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nemiga, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno included xsepower, who contributed 18 kills, and BELCHONOKK, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7915 total damage, Nemiga couldn't prevent RUBIK from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date