O PLANO Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

4

+2

87

4:1

5

0

7.3

+6%

11

16

2

-5

69

1:2

3

0

5.4

-15%

10

14

2

-4

54

0:2

1

1

5.2

-22%

10

19

2

-9

49

3:5

3

0

4.6

-29%

8

17

4

-9

49

1:2

3

0

4.5

-32%

Total

57

82

14

-25

307

9:12

15

1

5.4

-18%

Sharks Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

29

11

2

+18

121

2:1

10

1

9.1

+61%

14

12

5

+2

89

2:1

3

2

6.7

+2%

14

10

4

+4

73

0:3

5

1

6.2

+7%

12

10

2

+2

58

4:1

2

0

5.9

-6%

13

14

0

-1

67

4:3

1

0

5.8

0%

Total

82

57

13

+25

409

12:9

21

4

6.7

+13%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of O PLANO vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Nuke Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Nuke were chay, who contributed 29 kills, and togs, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8581 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


O PLANO on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for O PLANO, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for O PLANO on Nuke included kNgV-, who contributed 18 kills, and piriaz1n, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6447 total damage, O PLANO couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, O PLANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date