OG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

22

6

-2

83

5:3

7

0

6.4

+3%

19

18

3

+1

73

3:2

2

1

6.1

-5%

16

15

3

+1

60

3:0

3

0

5.9

-8%

12

16

6

-4

61

1:2

2

0

5.1

-14%

16

18

1

-2

56

1:7

5

0

4.9

-8%

Total

83

89

19

-6

333

13:14

19

1

5.7

-6%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

17

2

+3

82

4:0

7

1

6.8

+4%

23

14

2

+9

73

4:3

5

0

6.6

+12%

20

21

6

-1

79

2:2

4

0

6.2

+7%

16

17

8

-1

76

3:4

2

0

5.9

0%

8

16

5

-8

39

0:3

2

0

4.1

-27%

Total

87

85

23

+2

349

13:12

20

1

5.9

-1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Inferno Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno were XANTARES, who contributed 20 kills, and syrsoN, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9772 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Inferno included Aleksib, who contributed 20 kills, and valde, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9315 total damage, OG couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date