OG Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

27

16

2

+11

90

3:3

7

0

7.2

+31%

23

17

5

+6

91

5:4

6

0

6.6

+22%

21

17

3

+4

72

5:1

5

0

6.3

+1%

13

18

2

-5

51

0:1

2

0

4.9

-13%

13

17

3

-4

55

2:5

4

1

4.9

-13%

Total

97

85

15

+12

360

15:14

24

1

6.0

+6%

SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

3

+7

69

3:1

7

0

6.4

+4%

22

23

4

-1

87

6:4

9

0

6.4

+5%

15

17

3

-2

71

3:4

3

0

5.5

-4%

14

20

4

-6

50

2:3

3

0

4.8

-18%

10

20

3

-10

47

0:3

2

0

4.3

-30%

Total

85

97

17

-12

324

14:15

24

0

5.5

-9%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Nuke Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Nuke were F1KU, who contributed 27 kills, and FASHR, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10439 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SAW on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke included story, who contributed 24 kills, and arrozdoce, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9391 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date