PACT Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

13

1

+17

118

4:0

9

0

8.3

+42%

24

13

5

+11

91

4:2

5

1

7.9

+38%

16

18

6

-2

71

4:2

3

0

5.9

0%

12

15

6

-3

65

1:1

3

0

5.3

-8%

9

14

2

-5

40

3:4

1

1

4.6

-21%

Total

91

73

20

+18

386

16:9

21

2

6.4

+10%

MASONIC Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

15

4

+5

81

3:4

6

1

7.0

+10%

18

15

0

+3

77

2:1

4

0

6.6

+5%

13

20

3

-7

58

1:3

4

0

5.0

-9%

12

21

3

-9

55

2:5

5

0

4.9

-27%

9

20

2

-11

42

1:3

1

0

4.4

-31%

Total

72

91

12

-19

314

9:16

20

1

5.6

-10%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of PACT vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team

PACT on Nuke Analysis

PACT demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for PACT on Nuke were Sobol, who contributed 30 kills, and MINISE, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9644 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, PACT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MASONIC on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MASONIC on Nuke included brzer, who contributed 20 kills, and Queenix, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7861 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent PACT from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date