Paradox Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

6

7

+16

124

5:0

7

0

9.0

+55%

19

9

5

+10

109

2:2

6

0

7.7

+27%

19

12

4

+7

101

2:3

3

0

7.2

+15%

14

5

3

+9

64

1:1

3

0

6.4

+25%

10

5

7

+5

54

2:1

3

1

6.1

+5%

Total

84

37

26

+47

452

12:7

22

1

7.3

+26%

FURY Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

18

3

-9

69

3:0

3

0

5.7

-9%

9

15

1

-6

61

2:0

2

1

5.6

-2%

11

16

0

-5

58

0:0

3

0

5.2

+11%

5

18

3

-13

43

2:6

0

0

3.6

-19%

3

18

2

-15

33

0:6

1

0

2.9

-37%

Total

37

85

9

-48

263

7:12

9

1

4.6

-11%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Paradox vs FURY by the Bo3.gg Team

Paradox on Inferno Analysis

Paradox demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Paradox on Inferno were Versa, who contributed 22 kills, and zeph, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8593 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FURY on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FURY, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FURY on Inferno included Jimmy, who contributed 9 kills, and toM, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4989 total damage, FURY couldn't prevent Paradox from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FURY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date