Sampi Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

12

2

+9

104

3:1

7

0

7.7

+42%

16

13

5

+3

81

4:3

5

0

6.5

+14%

15

10

4

+5

83

0:0

3

0

6.4

+17%

13

12

1

+1

58

1:3

3

1

5.4

-3%

9

16

5

-7

58

1:5

2

0

4.4

-19%

Total

74

63

17

+11

384

9:12

20

1

6.1

+10%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

14

1

+4

89

5:2

3

0

7.3

+17%

16

17

5

-1

84

2:3

5

0

6.3

+6%

12

19

5

-7

63

1:0

4

0

5.2

-25%

9

15

3

-6

67

3:3

1

0

5.2

-19%

8

14

4

-6

45

1:1

2

0

4.6

-23%

Total

63

79

18

-16

349

12:9

15

0

5.7

-9%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Sampi vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Sampi on Anubis Analysis

Sampi demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sampi on Anubis were sAvana1, who contributed 21 kills, and The eLiVe, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8057 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included simke, who contributed 18 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7326 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Sampi from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date