Sangal Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

16

1

+8

97

2:4

5

0

6.8

+15%

21

21

3

0

81

4:1

3

1

6.6

+22%

17

21

4

-4

75

4:2

5

0

5.8

+8%

8

21

3

-13

40

1:2

1

0

4.0

-36%

10

21

1

-11

37

2:5

1

0

4.0

-27%

Total

80

100

12

-20

330

13:14

15

1

5.4

-3%

AGO Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

17

5

+11

126

6:2

7

1

8.2

+37%

22

17

1

+5

91

3:3

6

0

6.5

+6%

21

15

3

+6

68

4:2

5

0

6.5

-5%

12

16

5

-4

59

1:1

4

0

5.3

-9%

16

16

2

0

64

0:5

5

1

5.3

-5%

Total

99

81

16

+18

407

14:13

27

2

6.4

+5%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Nuke Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Nuke were rallen, who contributed 28 kills, and F1KU, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10990 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Nuke included paz, who contributed 24 kills, and l0gicman, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8907 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date