Sangal Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

16

4

+9

99

5:5

7

0

7.3

+17%

16

20

11

-4

97

5:3

4

0

6.4

-5%

20

14

3

+6

62

1:1

4

0

6.1

+3%

19

17

8

+2

66

2:3

5

1

6.0

+7%

17

13

5

+4

63

1:2

5

0

5.7

-2%

Total

97

80

31

+17

387

14:14

25

1

6.3

+4%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

20

4

0

76

3:2

4

0

6.2

-1%

18

20

5

-2

71

2:1

2

0

6.0

-10%

14

21

6

-7

68

2:3

2

1

5.4

-22%

16

20

4

-4

63

4:6

2

0

5.4

-19%

11

19

5

-8

46

3:2

2

0

4.8

-29%

Total

79

100

24

-21

324

14:14

12

1

5.5

-16%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno were soulfly, who contributed 25 kills, and phzy, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10826 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


fnatic on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for fnatic, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno included KRIMZ, who contributed 20 kills, and nicoodoz, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9066 total damage, fnatic couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date