Sangal Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

10

4

+17

129

3:0

7

0

9.1

+59%

22

9

8

+13

94

4:0

7

1

8.6

+37%

16

10

3

+6

81

3:1

2

1

7.4

+19%

10

12

7

-2

59

3:4

1

0

5.6

-8%

6

9

2

-3

37

0:3

2

0

4.3

-19%

Total

81

50

24

+31

401

13:8

19

2

7.0

+18%

MASONIC Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

15

4

-2

84

3:2

4

0

6.2

+3%

13

14

2

-1

69

1:1

4

0

5.8

-1%

11

18

2

-7

57

3:1

1

0

5.4

-17%

8

16

3

-8

51

1:2

1

0

4.6

-16%

5

18

4

-13

32

0:7

2

0

3.3

-49%

Total

50

81

15

-31

294

8:13

12

0

5.1

-16%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno were kyuubii, who contributed 27 kills, and PANIX, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8415 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MASONIC on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno included PR1mE, who contributed 13 kills, and mAnGo, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6176 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date